Cid new episode december 2016
In the case of Sherlock Holmes, we've got the rule that early works falling into the public domain can be freely used, but if you're building on them or adapting them, you can't incorporate character traits or story points from later works that are still under copyright. But each is subtly different, and together they form a trifecta that snuffs out giant swathes of the public domain. Other examples include the high-profile fight over Sherlock Holmes, and the recent loss over Wizard Of Oz promotional materials. This is of course not the first time we've seen such an attempt to nibble (or chomp) away at the edges of the public domain. "Accordingly, the newly-added elements, and only the newly-added elements, of these Middle Episodes which did not previously appear in the first 79 episodes of The Andy Griffith Show (which remain protected by statutory copyright) have fallen into the public domain in the United States," he writes. CBS attorney Jonathan Zavin argues that, because CBS holds valid and existing copyrights for the first 79 episodes of the series, the "copyrighted characters and numerous other original creative elements" that appeared in those episodes would still be protected in the middle episodes. The episodes at issue in the suit fell into the public domain in the '90s because the copyright-renewal application was rejected for being filed too late and, according to the suit, that's one of the reasons Heldman thinks his posting them was legitimate. How, you ask? Isn't the public domain the, uh, public domain? Apparently not if you get creative with your lawsuit: In the mean time, they're suing a YouTube channel for copyright infringement after it posted sixteen public domain episodes of the Andy Griffith show.
Cid new episode december 2016 how to#
Okay fine, CBS hasn't sued "the public domain" - but at this point I suspect that's only because they haven't figured out how to do so.